AAAI-27 desk rejection over incredibly minor abstract modifications [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Has anyone else received an AAAI-27 desk rejection related to modifications to the title or abstract between the abstract-registration deadline and the full-paper deadline?
What I’m trying to understand is how the modification rule is being applied in practice. The AAAI-27 modification guidelines say that the title and abstract can still be edited after abstract registration, while warning against substantive changes, and describe rejection in terms of changes that make the submission describe qualitatively different research.
In my case, almost everything was identical. The modifications were incredibly minor.
The rejection notice says that the decision is final and appeals will not be considered.
Did this happen to anyone else?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
I turned my dog Jackies Brain into a working AI [P]
Oct 14
-
Event2Vec: additive event embeddings where a linear score on a history decomposes exactly into per-event terms [P]
Oct 14
-
Binary noise classification using CRNN mean teacher algo [R]
Oct 14
-
Localized Neural learning vs backpropagation [D]
Oct 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.