Why Summaries Turn Neutral: Policy Attribution for Sentiment Drift in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2608.15530 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Aug 2026]
Title:Why Summaries Turn Neutral: Policy Attribution for Sentiment Drift in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
View a PDF of the paper titled Why Summaries Turn Neutral: Policy Attribution for Sentiment Drift in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, by Mikhail Krasitskii and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) aligns LLMs with human preferences, improving summarization fluency and safety, but causes sentiment drift: overly neutral summaries stripped of emotional nuance. We diagnose why RL acts as a sentiment neutralizer and present Policy Attribution, a framework using gradient and logit decomposition to trace drift to reward model (RM) signals and KL (Kullback-Leibler) penalty. Sentiment drift reflects a strategic bias toward "low-risk" tokens maximizing expected rewards under preference uncertainty (Stiennon et al., 2020; Gao, Schulman, and Hilton, 2023). On Reddit TL;DR and CNN/DailyMail, RLHF summaries get higher rewards but show 30-40% lower sentiment variance. Cross-lingual analysis across eight languages shows language-independent drift, with morphologically richer languages more suppressed (Krasitskii et al., 2026). We propose and validate a sentiment-aware regularization technique reducing drift by 18-22% without harming summary quality. The code and toolkit will be public.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.15530 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.15530v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15530
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Mikhail Krasitskii [view email][v1] Sun, 16 Aug 2026 04:56:03 UTC (340 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Why Summaries Turn Neutral: Policy Attribution for Sentiment Drift in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, by Mikhail Krasitskii and 3 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.