Deepseek Harnness - why is feels better
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Guys, could someone smarter than me explain what makes Deepseek Harness so efficient? I run it with local Qwen 3.8 (Q6). I tried Opencode/Openchamber (my favourite so far), Pi agent and Hermes. New Qwen seems to overthing by default but this could be minimized with some effort. On another hand - in Deepseek Harness, it just took of - the thinking effort is correct (subjectively), it delivers great results and the content window seems to be never ending (comparing to Opencode). Not sure what is so special about DSH - is it so special, or my complicated settings for Opencode just don't work with new Qwen so well.
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
Unpopular opinion Qwen 3.8 is hard to understand
Aug 30
-
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next turns 4xR9700 into a local AI powerhouse! 120 t/s TG and 12k t/s PP single request with optimized vLLM
Aug 30
-
Oh so that's where my PCIe lanes went...
Aug 30
-
Uncensored Multi-Model Releases, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse with MTPs and LSAs, Qwen3.8-27B with MTPs, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B with MTPs, Qwen3-Coder-Next and Laguna-S2.1 with Vision, All Available in GGUF Format! Bonus: Links to my llama.cpp Fork for LongCat-Flash-Lite Support and…
Aug 30
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.