One thing that's been bothering me lately: benchmark performance often tells me almost nothing about whether a workflow will survive production usage.[D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I've seen systems score well internally and then immediately fail under:
- ambiguous user intent
- messy real-world context
- contradictory instructions
- long-running sessions
Feels like evaluation still heavily rewards clean-task optimization instead of behavioral robustness.
What are people using beyond standard eval pipelines?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Improving machine-translated novels via style transfer — looking for advice on the faithfulness/fluency tradeoff [P]
Jul 2
-
How papers are selected for Best Paper, Oral, or Highlight presentation at major ML/CV conferences such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, and ICLR? [D]
Jul 2
-
BMVC 2026 Review Discussion Thread [D]
Jul 2
-
Has anyone tried this approach with Fast Byte Latent Transformers ? [R]
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.