Writerslogic at the CLEF 2026 SimpleText Track: Multi-Candidate LLM Simplification and Stacked Complexity Spotting
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2610.03567 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Oct 2026]
Title:Writerslogic at the CLEF 2026 SimpleText Track: Multi-Candidate LLM Simplification and Stacked Complexity Spotting
Authors:David L. Condrey
View a PDF of the paper titled Writerslogic at the CLEF 2026 SimpleText Track: Multi-Candidate LLM Simplification and Stacked Complexity Spotting, by David L. Condrey
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We describe the Writerslogic team's participation in the CLEF 2026 SimpleText shared task, addressing Task 1 (text simplification) and Task 2 (complexity spotting). For Task 1, we develop a multi-candidate generation pipeline using GPT-4o-mini that produces five simplification candidates per sentence at varying temperatures, then selects the best candidate using a reference-free scoring heuristic that rewards compression, source word retention, Cochrane Plain Language Summary vocabulary usage, and lexical simplicity. On Task 1.1 (sentence-level simplification), our Claude Sonnet 4 submission achieves SARI 47.43 and BLEU 14.21, the top-ranked sentence-level system (3rd on the combined Task 1 leaderboard, behind two document-level submissions). For Task 2, we fine-tune a DeBERTa-v3-large NLI model on 350K labeled (source, sentence) pairs, framing hallucination detection as natural language inference. The model reads the most relevant source sentence as premise and the candidate as hypothesis, directly learning to distinguish grounded from hallucinated content. On Task 2.1 (binary overgeneration identification), our fine-tuned DeBERTa system achieves 0.8081 document-level macro F1 (0.8085 in our best ensemble), the top-ranked entry within the identification track and 2nd among teams overall, behind AIIR Lab (0.8197). On Task 2.2 (multi-class error classification), our best submission reaches 0.804 multiclass accuracy, ranking 2nd among unique teams behind AIIR Lab (0.827). We evaluate both tasks on English and multilingual biomedical text from Cochrane systematic reviews.
| Comments: | 11 pages, 3 tables. Notebook for the SimpleText Lab at CLEF 2026. Code: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| MSC classes: | 68T50, 68T05 |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; I.2.6 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.03567 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2610.03567v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03567
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Journal reference: | CLEF 2026 Working Notes, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 6068-6078 |
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Writerslogic at the CLEF 2026 SimpleText Track: Multi-Candidate LLM Simplification and Stacked Complexity Spotting, by David L. Condrey
Ancillary-file links:
Ancillary files (details):
- README.txt
- simpletext-clef2026/LICENSE
- simpletext-clef2026/README.md
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/batch_haiku.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/batch_opus.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/batch_sonnet.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/ensemble_best.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/ensemble_strategies.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/eval_local.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/eval_scraped.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/pyproject.toml
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/scrape_cochrane.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_ensemble.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_local.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_ollama.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_pls_grounded.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_pls_task12.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_rag.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_regex.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_v2.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_v3.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_v4.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_v5.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task1/simplify_v6.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/build_portfolio.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/classify.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/classify_v2.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/classify_v3.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/classify_v4.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/feature_extraction.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/llm_grounding.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/llm_grounding_v2.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/main.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/modal_finetune_deberta.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/modal_finetune_shidey.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/modal_nli_inference.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/predict.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/predict_v6.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/predict_v7.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/pyproject.toml
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/train.py
- simpletext-clef2026/task2/train_v7.py
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.