Verbosity is not faithfulness: an architectural argument that reasoning models cannot perform faithful inference [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Essay argues that reasoning models cannot perform faithful inference because their reasoning trace and final answer come from the same operation. Engages with Lanham/Turpin/Mirzadeh in empirical critique, and with HRM, TRM, GRAM, AlphaProof, and Kona/Aleph as the contrasting architectural lineage.
Curious what this subreddit makes of the constraint-vs-influence framing.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Improving machine-translated novels via style transfer — looking for advice on the faithfulness/fluency tradeoff [P]
Jul 2
-
How papers are selected for Best Paper, Oral, or Highlight presentation at major ML/CV conferences such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, and ICLR? [D]
Jul 2
-
BMVC 2026 Review Discussion Thread [D]
Jul 2
-
Has anyone tried this approach with Fast Byte Latent Transformers ? [R]
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.