GLM5.2 performance.
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I was wondering how fast GLM5.2 (Nvidia’s 460GB nvfp4 checkpoint) is running on your rigs. I have it running at ~1tok/s in the simulation harness. The data extrapolates to 75tok/s on the real Cuda MGPU machine. So I would like to collect data from you how fast it runs for you.
State your tok/s first so I can easily parse and then give some guidance on what inference engine and what the hardware runs on.
Example:
1tok/s pp and 1tok/s gen using custom ispc inference engine on 8ch DDR-6400 3175F TURIN and memory is 125% oversubscribed with disk is serving at 1GB/s etc.
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
Unpopular opinion Qwen 3.8 is hard to understand
Aug 30
-
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next turns 4xR9700 into a local AI powerhouse! 120 t/s TG and 12k t/s PP single request with optimized vLLM
Aug 30
-
Oh so that's where my PCIe lanes went...
Aug 30
-
Uncensored Multi-Model Releases, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse with MTPs and LSAs, Qwen3.8-27B with MTPs, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B with MTPs, Qwen3-Coder-Next and Laguna-S2.1 with Vision, All Available in GGUF Format! Bonus: Links to my llama.cpp Fork for LongCat-Flash-Lite Support and…
Aug 30
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.