arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Do Large Language Models Perform Well on Comprehending Poetic Logic in Modern Chinese Poetry?

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.21827 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Aug 2026]

Title:Do Large Language Models Perform Well on Comprehending Poetic Logic in Modern Chinese Poetry?

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Large Language Models Perform Well on Comprehending Poetic Logic in Modern Chinese Poetry?, by Tian Lan and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant progress across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their ability to understand literary texts, particularly modern Chinese poetry, remains largely unexplored. The unique literary characteristics of modern Chinese poetry necessitate a distinct form of reasoning for effective comprehension. Unlike conventional texts that convey clear information, the unique "poetic logic" of modern Chinese poetry requires a holistic reasoning approach that goes beyond superficial semantic analysis to be understood. However, current evaluation paradigms largely ignore this critical dimension. To address this gap, we propose Peony, the first benchmark specifically designed for evaluating the poetic logic of modern Chinese poetry. We define poetic logic as four tasks across three levels, namely stanza, line, and imagery, and systematically evaluate and analyze six mainstream LLMs based on Peony. We evaluate these models under both non-thinking and thinking configurations. The experimental results reveal the limitations of current LLMs in understanding the poetic logic of modern Chinese poetry and validate the effectiveness and necessity of Peony. Our data and code will be available.
Comments: 20 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.21827 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.21827v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21827
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Tian Lan [view email]
[v1] Sat, 22 Aug 2026 07:52:00 UTC (2,354 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Do Large Language Models Perform Well on Comprehending Poetic Logic in Modern Chinese Poetry?, by Tian Lan and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language