arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2507.15692 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Jul 2025]

Title:Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions

View a PDF of the paper titled Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions, by Meng Chen and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) provide new opportunities for blind and low vision (BLV) people to access visual information in their daily lives. However, these models often produce errors that are difficult to detect without sight, posing safety and social risks in scenarios from medication identification to outfit selection. While BLV MLLM users use creative workarounds such as cross-checking between tools and consulting sighted individuals, these approaches are often time-consuming and impractical. We explore how systematically surfacing variations across multiple MLLM responses can support BLV users to detect unreliable information without visually inspecting the image. We contribute a design space for eliciting and presenting variations in MLLM descriptions, a prototype system implementing three variation presentation styles, and findings from a user study with 15 BLV participants. Our results demonstrate that presenting variations significantly increases users' ability to identify unreliable claims (by 4.9x using our approach compared to single descriptions) and significantly decreases perceived reliability of MLLM responses. 14 of 15 participants preferred seeing variations of MLLM responses over a single description, and all expressed interest in using our system for tasks from understanding a tornado's path to posting an image on social media.
Comments: 18 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2507.15692 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2507.15692v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.15692
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3663547.3746393
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Meng Chen [view email]
[v1] Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:59:50 UTC (5,061 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions, by Meng Chen and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
Ancillary-file links:

Ancillary files (details):

Current browse context:

cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language