ODRA: Synthesizing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Sessions with Structured Chain-Of-Thought and Dynamic Patient Resistance
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:ODRA: Synthesizing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Sessions with Structured Chain-Of-Thought and Dynamic Patient Resistance
Abstract:Synthetic generation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) sessions is challenged by two competing demands: adhering to strict therapeutic structure while modeling the resistant, unpredictable behavior of real patients. Existing script-based methods fail to capture dynamic therapeutic interactions, while multi-agent approaches struggle to adhere to CBT's sequential structure; both suffer from sycophancy, producing overly compliant patients that misrepresent real clinical settings. In this work we introduce ODRA, a novel framework for synthesizing therapy dialogues through a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) strategy grounded in foundational CBT guidelines (Beck, 2020). ODRA further incorporates a resistance orchestrator to solve patient sycophancy, which employs steering techniques to elicit behaviors aligned with their resistance level. Automated and expert evaluations show that ODRA significantly outperforms existing methods across therapeutic skills, CBT alignment, and patient behavioral fidelity, with licensed psychologists preferring ODRA sessions across 12 of 13 clinical metrics. Furthermore, models fine-tuned on our dataset demonstrate superior therapeutic performance against both cooperative and resistant patients, validating that explicit resistance modeling in synthetic training data directly translates to downstream clinical robustness.
| Comments: | 39 pages, 23 figures, 12 tables |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.04524 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.04524v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04524
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Javier Rodríguez Juan [view email][v1] Wed, 5 Aug 2026 06:56:58 UTC (632 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.