A Grounded and Decomposed Framework for Relation-Level Hallucination Evaluation in Abstractive Summarization
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:A Grounded and Decomposed Framework for Relation-Level Hallucination Evaluation in Abstractive Summarization
Abstract:Abstractive text summarization systems frequently generate fluent yet unfaithful summaries by fabricating or distorting relationships between entities and
events. Such relation-level hallucinations undermine the reliability of generated summaries, particularly in high-stakes domains. In this work, we present a
refined and grounded framework for evaluating relation hallucination in abstractive summarization. We present the empirical Relation Hallucination Index (RHI) by
introducing a dependency-aware relation extraction algorithm that incorporates lemmatization-based normalization, named entity grounded subject resolution,
passive agent recovery, negation-aware verb modeling, reporting verb filtering, nominal relation fallback, clausal propagation, and systematic deduplication.
These enhancements improve the structural fidelity of extracted relation triples and reduce spurious matches during evaluation. In addition, we introduce a
normalized formulation of RHI to ensure scale-invariant comparison between datasets and models. The revised metric decomposes hallucination into interpretable
components, aggregates relation hallucination metric into a normalized relation faithfulness score. Extensive evaluation across multiple state-of-the-art
summarization models demonstrates that the grounded extraction process yields more stable and discriminative hallucination measurements. The proposed framework
advances automated relation-level faithfulness evaluation and supports coherence-aware, hallucination-sensitive model analysis.
| Comments: | 6 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; H.3.1 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.08180 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.08180v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.08180
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.