The Imitation Game: When LLMs Learn to Reason Like Programs via Code-Centric Reasoning Data Synthesis
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.16076 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026]
Title:The Imitation Game: When LLMs Learn to Reason Like Programs via Code-Centric Reasoning Data Synthesis
Authors:Jinyang Zhang, Weibin Liao, Keqin Bao, Sihang Li, Shaobo Wang, Muyang Ye, Hongxin Ding, Yue Fang, Tianyi Tang, Fei Huang, Kexin Yang, Xingzhang Ren, Dayiheng Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled The Imitation Game: When LLMs Learn to Reason Like Programs via Code-Centric Reasoning Data Synthesis, by Jinyang Zhang and 12 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at programming tasks but frequently fail at deterministic, fine-grained reasoning in natural language, relying heavily on semantic approximations rather than robust symbolic execution. To bridge this gap, we propose MIMIC, a framework that leverages executable code as a rigorous medium for reasoning data synthesis. MIMIC fundamentally transforms algorithms into verifiable reasoning trajectories through narrative fusion, code-guided test synthesis, and dynamic code instrumentation. Crucially, these explicit intermediate execution states naturally form a Code-Instrumented Reward (CIR), providing dense, high-fidelity process supervision for reinforcement learning without external reward models. Extensive evaluations reveal that models trained via SFT and GRPO on our synthesized dataset achieve substantial, consistent gains. Our method significantly elevates accuracy across general reasoning, complex mathematical benchmarks, and fine-grained deterministic tasks, demonstrating that the procedural rigor of executable code can effectively unlock and enhance the generalized reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Our code and data are available at this https URL.
| Comments: | Accepted by EMNLP26 main |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.16076 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.16076v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16076
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled The Imitation Game: When LLMs Learn to Reason Like Programs via Code-Centric Reasoning Data Synthesis, by Jinyang Zhang and 12 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.