Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias
Abstract:Language models (LMs) often pass behavioral bias evaluations, but it remains unclear whether they no longer represent the underlying associations that give rise to biases, or have merely learned not to express them. In this study, we show that representational biases are often detectable, even when behavioral biases are not visible. We introduce a causal framework that decomposes occupational bias into two measurement points: a model's internal representation of a user's competence, and its observable outputs. We derive steering vectors for representations of user expertise, and verify that they causally mediate model behavior in both a question-answering task and a hiring task. Applying this framework to several open-weight models, we find that demographic attributes, such as gender, race, and socioeconomic status, influence a model's representation of user expertise, even in cases where behavioral metrics detect no disparity between demographics. We show that these model representations can influence downstream behavior under intervention, suggesting failure modes that behavioral metrics alone may not detect.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.20347 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.20347v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20347
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Keren De Jesus Fuentes [view email][v1] Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:03:52 UTC (1,101 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.