arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.20347 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Jun 2026]

Title:Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias

View a PDF of the paper titled Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias, by Keren Fuentes and Aaron Mueller
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Language models (LMs) often pass behavioral bias evaluations, but it remains unclear whether they no longer represent the underlying associations that give rise to biases, or have merely learned not to express them. In this study, we show that representational biases are often detectable, even when behavioral biases are not visible. We introduce a causal framework that decomposes occupational bias into two measurement points: a model's internal representation of a user's competence, and its observable outputs. We derive steering vectors for representations of user expertise, and verify that they causally mediate model behavior in both a question-answering task and a hiring task. Applying this framework to several open-weight models, we find that demographic attributes, such as gender, race, and socioeconomic status, influence a model's representation of user expertise, even in cases where behavioral metrics detect no disparity between demographics. We show that these model representations can influence downstream behavior under intervention, suggesting failure modes that behavioral metrics alone may not detect.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.20347 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.20347v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20347
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Keren De Jesus Fuentes [view email]
[v1] Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:03:52 UTC (1,101 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias, by Keren Fuentes and Aaron Mueller
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language