arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

The Missing Minimal Pair: Stereotype Evaluation in LLMs

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2610.08747 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Oct 2026]

Title:The Missing Minimal Pair: Stereotype Evaluation in LLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled The Missing Minimal Pair: Stereotype Evaluation in LLMs, by Nataliya Stepanova and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A common approach to measuring bias in Large Language Models is to compare the log-likelihoods of two contrastive stereotype sentences. We argue that such single-pair comparisons are often unreliable: simply rewriting the same stereotype with an alternative attribute can yield logically inconsistent preferences. To address this, we propose a dual minimal pair setup that introduces two axes of comparison for robust stereotype evaluation. First, we present a data-augmentation framework that fills critical gaps in existing stereotype datasets by generating paraphrases and alternate attributes. We apply our framework on a set of English, Russian, Spanish and Chinese stereotypes. Second, we introduce two evaluation metrics tailored to the dual minimal pair setup. One of these metrics provides a new perspective on bias by modeling the mutual information (MI) between social groups and stereotyped attributes. This MI-based metric is better suited for aggregation and enables more robust comparisons of stereotype strength across different languages and models.
Our code is available at this https URL.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.08747 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2610.08747v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08747
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nataliya Stepanova [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 17:41:44 UTC (2,234 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language