ICLR submissions are broken. Maybe a prediction market? [P]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
ICLR has received >40k submissions this year and it is becoming quite difficult to make sense of all of the papers (including a lot of AI generated ones).
Larry Wasserman called for “A World Without Referees” back in 2012 [1], but peer review hasn’t changed much since. I built https://acceptodds.com, as an attempt to maybe help sort out the good from the bad through a prediction market (not with real money, it's a game and not intended to replace peer review). Oh and it also has a cool map for discovering papers :).
If you’ve interested or you've submitted to ICLR check out what the market thinks of your paper and bet on some papers in your area. LMK what you think or if you have any interesting ideas for it!
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
I turned my dog Jackies Brain into a working AI [P]
Oct 14
-
Event2Vec: additive event embeddings where a linear score on a history decomposes exactly into per-event terms [P]
Oct 14
-
Binary noise classification using CRNN mean teacher algo [R]
Oct 14
-
Localized Neural learning vs backpropagation [D]
Oct 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.