vllm + p2p driver hack + qwen 3.8 27B vs llamacpp + qwen flash next ?
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Hi everyone
I'm running four rtx 4090, 64GB ram, on a threadripper pro motherboard so all PCIe x16 ports, as a homelab machine for coding.
I was migrating from vllm + qwen 3.8 27B (fp8+256k kv cache) to llamacpp + qwen flash next iq4xs + 8 bit cache 200k kv cache... until someone had to ruin my migration with this awesome patch to enable p2p between cards on the open source nvidia drivers. On my hardware configuration apparently this would matter a lot. But only VLLM would benefit from it, not llamacpp - and no 4 bit like quant available on vllm and not enough vram for qwen flash next fp8.
I hereby ask the grand experts, what should I do amd what are your opinions?
vllm + qwen 3.8 27B dense + p2p driver patch + 256k kv cache
llamacpp + qwen flash next MoE iq4xs + 200k kv cache
Is qwen flash next really worth the extra intelligence versus higher throughput with vllm and sticking to qwen 3.8 27B ?
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
The AI race: China's open-weight models trail US closed models by just 7 months
Oct 14
-
Anthropic Executive Says Open-Source AI Models Are Higher Risk
Oct 14
-
ComfyUI v0.40.0 released
Oct 14
-
So this is how they do it --> RTX 5090, once a consumer gaming card, is now on smugglers’ menu alongside cigarettes
Oct 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.