We find a surprising failure mode, <strong>forecast collapse</strong>, of Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs). Despite their strong performance across general time-series benchmarks, we observe that TSFMs can generate overly smooth or near-constant forecasts that fail to reflect the heterogeneous dynamics of the underlying multivariate series.</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-08-17T05:39:02.155Z","author":{"_id":"63e8882e4577a86987ad91c2","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/CmgkIiJ9Unu1HlPtp7TqF.png","fullname":"Shu","name":"Shuwan","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":1,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8607839941978455},"editors":["Shuwan"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/CmgkIiJ9Unu1HlPtp7TqF.png"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.14106","authors":[{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814cd","name":"Shu Wan","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814ce","name":"Miles Ma","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814cf","name":"Hank Zhu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814d0","name":"Guangqi Liu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814d1","name":"Stephen Wang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814d2","name":"Qingsong Wen","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a829c93b601d59c652814d3","name":"Huan Liu","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z","title":"Forecast Collapse in Time-Series Foundation Models","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"63e8882e4577a86987ad91c2","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/CmgkIiJ9Unu1HlPtp7TqF.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"Shu","user":"Shuwan","type":"user","name":"Shuwan"},"summary":"When forecasting hourly returns for 1,000 US equities, we observe an unexpected phenomenon: predictions become nearly flat and show poor stock ranking, as measured by cross-sectional correlation. We call this forecast collapse. Surprisingly, the phenomenon largely disappears when forecasting trading volume under the same setting. We investigate forecast collapse across time-series foundation models (TSFMs), twelve deep-learning forecasting models, and 97 public benchmark configurations, and find that it is closely tied to target predictability. We identify two distinct reasons behind it: low predictability limits the amplitude of calibrated point forecasts, while per-series objectives leave cross-series structure unidentified. These findings reveal a calibration-ranking tradeoff: optimizing squared error leads to flat predictions, whereas directly optimizing cross-sectional correlation improves ranking but can inflate forecast amplitude by more than an order of magnitude. To address this tradeoff, we introduce CalibRank, a simple objective that balances calibration and ranking. On Finance1K, CalibRank nearly triples cross-sectional correlation while keeping amplitude close to the target, and improves correlation on all tested models. Our results reveal a blind spot in conventional time-series evaluation: per-series metrics can hide failures in cross-series structure needed by downstream decisions.","upvotes":7,"discussionId":"6a829c94b601d59c652814d4","ai_summary":"Forecast collapse in hourly equity return prediction stems from low predictability and per-series objectives, and the proposed CalibRank objective balances calibration and ranking to restore cross-sectional structure.","ai_keywords":["forecast collapse","time-series foundation models","cross-sectional correlation","calibration-ranking tradeoff","CalibRank","per-series objectives"],"ai_summary_model":"thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small","organization":{"_id":"6a396f6821954f7afc3136b4","name":"abel-lab","fullname":"Abel","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63e8882e4577a86987ad91c2/K7kvaiiKEV6YGyBNLSO6S.png"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"63e8882e4577a86987ad91c2","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/CmgkIiJ9Unu1HlPtp7TqF.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"Shu","user":"Shuwan","type":"user"},{"_id":"6a3b6a44d3cae0e13ea74b55","avatarUrl":"/avatars/c2dc25e9aaa1c991c4a279adc900d5a4.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Rui Zhu","user":"RuiLGTM","type":"user"},{"_id":"6458967ad1d994ec81053829","avatarUrl":"/avatars/8f1a0df9f7c19b9f3cf285a49f59806a.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"chen si","user":"exen3995","type":"user"},{"_id":"66613f260d1be84ebe820fdb","avatarUrl":"/avatars/da111c89af0774a143c6ee3b62364dae.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Zhu","user":"HankHHH","type":"user"},{"_id":"6a397c7249de0be3d22c7a13","avatarUrl":"/avatars/b47e2a3e6b637de99880c744e79734b0.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Stephen Wang","user":"cauchyabel","type":"user"},{"_id":"6a82a2ddefdaaaa68ae358ce","avatarUrl":"/avatars/33e4ef04b9b69853793c676b0c8aef76.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"elisa qian","user":"elqian","type":"user"},{"_id":"63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7/g6EX7diOpuA94R2ab-rZC.png","isPro":true,"fullname":"Dipankar Sarkar","user":"dipankarsarkar","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"organization":{"_id":"6a396f6821954f7afc3136b4","name":"abel-lab","fullname":"Abel","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63e8882e4577a86987ad91c2/K7kvaiiKEV6YGyBNLSO6S.png"},"query":{}}">
Forecast Collapse in Time-Series Foundation Models
Published on Aug 14
· Submitted by Shu on Aug 17 Abstract
Forecast collapse in hourly equity return prediction stems from low predictability and per-series objectives, and the proposed CalibRank objective balances calibration and ranking to restore cross-sectional structure.
When forecasting hourly returns for 1,000 US equities, we observe an unexpected phenomenon: predictions become nearly flat and show poor stock ranking, as measured by cross-sectional correlation. We call this forecast collapse. Surprisingly, the phenomenon largely disappears when forecasting trading volume under the same setting. We investigate forecast collapse across time-series foundation models (TSFMs), twelve deep-learning forecasting models, and 97 public benchmark configurations, and find that it is closely tied to target predictability. We identify two distinct reasons behind it: low predictability limits the amplitude of calibrated point forecasts, while per-series objectives leave cross-series structure unidentified. These findings reveal a calibration-ranking tradeoff: optimizing squared error leads to flat predictions, whereas directly optimizing cross-sectional correlation improves ranking but can inflate forecast amplitude by more than an order of magnitude. To address this tradeoff, we introduce CalibRank, a simple objective that balances calibration and ranking. On Finance1K, CalibRank nearly triples cross-sectional correlation while keeping amplitude close to the target, and improves correlation on all tested models. Our results reveal a blind spot in conventional time-series evaluation: per-series metrics can hide failures in cross-series structure needed by downstream decisions.
Community
We find a surprising failure mode, forecast collapse, of Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs). Despite their strong performance across general time-series benchmarks, we observe that TSFMs can generate overly smooth or near-constant forecasts that fail to reflect the heterogeneous dynamics of the underlying multivariate series.
Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14106 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14106 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.