Qwen3.8 27B reasoning effort low/medium/xhigh comparison
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
| I did a short test of the different reasoning efforts, since on default xhigh the model thinks a lot. Not very scientific, just a quick "generate an SVG of a pelican on a bicycle" prompt with 3 different seeds. I think the result is interesting none the less: xhigh gives *much\* higher visual fidelity - but it also takes about 7x as long as low. Low and medium seem to be very close to each other. Hardware and setup
Prompt:
Average results
[link] [comments] |
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.