r/LocalLLaMA · · 1 min read

Qwen3.8 27B reasoning effort low/medium/xhigh comparison

Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Qwen3.8 27B reasoning effort low/medium/xhigh comparison

I did a short test of the different reasoning efforts, since on default xhigh the model thinks a lot.

Not very scientific, just a quick "generate an SVG of a pelican on a bicycle" prompt with 3 different seeds. I think the result is interesting none the less: xhigh gives *much\* higher visual fidelity - but it also takes about 7x as long as low. Low and medium seem to be very close to each other.

https://preview.redd.it/fkbx5qf41qjh1.png?width=1560&format=png&auto=webp&s=bfc1e9679802605c61af203ca27422ed763b6a19

Hardware and setup

  • GPU: NVIDIA RTX 5080 Laptop GPU, 16 GB VRAM
  • Model: unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-UD-IQ3_XXS
  • llama.cpp: build 10451, commit 10bf611e5
  • Context: 65,536
  • KV cache: Q8_0
  • Flash Attention: enabled
  • MTP speculative decoding: --spec-default --spec-type draft-mtp
  • --fit off
  • One concurrent slot

Prompt:

Create a polished SVG graphic of a pelican riding a bicycle. The result must clearly show a recognizable pelican actively riding a recognizable two-wheeled bicycle. Return only one complete, self-contained SVG document with a viewBox; no Markdown fences, prose, external images, JavaScript, or animation.

Average results

Reasoning effort Reasoning tokens SVG tokens Total completion Wall time Generation speed MTP acceptance Visual score (Codex rated)
Low 4,418 3,966 8,387 111.6 s 75.4 t/s 62.1% 21.8/25
Medium 5,918 3,038 8,959 127.4 s 70.5 t/s 58.3% 22.5/25
X-High 39,398 5,085 44,487 717.8 s 62.0 t/s 52.7% 24.0/25
submitted by /u/Danmoreng
[link] [comments]

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from r/LocalLLaMA