From Structure to Validity: Mechanism-Guided Generation and Refinement of LLM Rubrics
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2610.13375 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Oct 2026]
Title:From Structure to Validity: Mechanism-Guided Generation and Refinement of LLM Rubrics
Authors:Feifei Qian, Xuan Chen, Lixin Cui, Chaoyang Mei, Fanlin Meng, Shuyao Xiao, Ming Cui, Junxi Yin, Lu Bai
View a PDF of the paper titled From Structure to Validity: Mechanism-Guided Generation and Refinement of LLM Rubrics, by Feifei Qian and 8 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Rubrics have been widely used to evaluate and optimize language models on open-ended tasks. However, existing work primarily focuses on generating better rubrics, with limited understanding of what makes rubric design effective. In this work, we conduct a systematic mechanistic analysis of rubric design across criterion organization, criterion operationalization, and score aggregation. Our analysis shows that structural organization enables more comprehensive criterion construction, semantic specification alone does not ensure effective criterion-level judgments, and sophisticated score aggregation provides limited additional gains. Guided by these findings, we introduce Adaptive Rubric Tree Search with Hybrid refinement (ARTS-Hybrid), which combines adaptive tree construction with semantic-first, response-calibrated refinement. Experiments across benchmarks show that ARTS-Hybrid improves both end-to-end evaluation performance and intrinsic rubric quality. Further experiments suggest that, beyond evaluation, rubrics generated by ARTS-Hybrid provide effective signals for model optimization.
| Comments: | Submitted to ICLR 2027 |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.13375 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2610.13375v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13375
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled From Structure to Validity: Mechanism-Guided Generation and Refinement of LLM Rubrics, by Feifei Qian and 8 other authors
Additional Features
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.