arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Rethinking Indirect Prompt Injection as a Test-Time Search Problem

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2609.04495 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026]

Title:Rethinking Indirect Prompt Injection as a Test-Time Search Problem

View a PDF of the paper titled Rethinking Indirect Prompt Injection as a Test-Time Search Problem, by Duong M. Nguyen and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We formulate indirect prompt injection as a test-time search over a task-dependent attack surface induced by the environment, user task, and injection task. To operationalize this formulation, we introduce an agentic attacker with a dedicated search harness that performs environment reconnaissance, structured reasoning over attack strategies, and adaptive evaluation using victim-agent feedback. Across heterogeneous tasks, we find that increasing attacker test-time compute improves vulnerability discovery and exploitation, while ablations show that explicit strategy management is important for avoiding redundant search and sustaining gains at larger budgets. These results suggest that agentic security evaluations should characterize both the attacker's search procedure and compute budget, rather than treating attack success as a budget-independent property of the victim. More broadly, our findings identify the attacker's adaptive search over the system attack surfaces as an important and underexplored security risk for tool-using agents.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.04495 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2609.04495v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04495
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Duong M. Nguyen [view email]
[v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 21:28:37 UTC (3,269 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language