A100 slow Qwen3.6-27B-FP8
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Setting up a server for someone who has an A100 80GB, even though this doesn't natively support FP8 does 43tps decode sound too low for single request?
For comparison the exact same vllm config on my RTX 6000 PRO runs the same single request test at 130tps.
For 8 concurrent requests the A100 decodes at 177tps vs 509tps for the 6000.
--model Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B-FP8 --max-num-seqs 8 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --enable-prefix-caching --max-model-len auto --enable-chunked-prefill --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --speculative-config '{"method":"mtp","num_speculative_tokens":3}' Benchmarking with vllm bench (e.g. here with 1 concurrent request)
vllm bench serve \ --model "qwen3.6-27b-fp8" \ --tokenizer "Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B-FP8" \ --base-url "http://127.0.0.1:8000" \ --endpoint "/v1/completions" \ --dataset-name "random" \ --num-prompts 1 \ --random-input-len 1024 \ --random-output-len 4096 \ --trust-remote-code [link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
Palantir CEO rages against closed models
Jul 2
-
SenseNova-U1-8b-MoT-Infographic-V2 (released yesterday) - An open source SOTA beast for infographic design and image editing.
Jul 2
-
[Benchmark] Kimi K2.7 Code Q3 on Mac Studio M3 Ultra + RTX PRO 6000 over llama.cpp RPC: prefill improves, no changes in token generation/decode
Jul 2
-
They fit! Mostly.... 2x 3090, Thermaltake Core p3
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.