arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2608.14089 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Aug 2026]

Title:Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers

View a PDF of the paper titled Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers, by Thiago Sandoval and Ufuk Topcu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Safety classifiers deployed with large language models often fail for two reasons: their decisions reflect the policy learned during training rather than the deployer's desired policy, and their performance degrades as deployment traffic evolves. We present Regime-Conditional Verification (RCV), a lightweight wrapper that adapts an off-the-shelf safety classifier without retraining it. RCV estimates, from the classifier's internal representations, the probability that each prediction disagrees with the deployer's policy, and selectively corrects predictions likely to be wrong. The same correctness estimates also provide a label-free signal for detecting distribution shift, enabling a maintenance loop that updates the correctness estimation layer and resorts to classifier fine-tuning only when necessary. Across three off-the-shelf safety classifiers and two benchmark datasets, RCV improves adherence to the deployer's policy in every classifier-dataset combination, catching up to 0.81 of previously missed unsafe content without modifying the underlying classifier. In a deployment study with ten attack campaigns, each a harm category held out of RCV's training, RCV detects every campaign in a dedicated injection panel; in the maintenance census most drift episodes are repaired without updating the classifier, and the fine-tune is reserved for the residual episodes that repair does not restore.
Comments: 16 pages including technical appendix, 6 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.14089 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2608.14089v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14089
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Thiago Costantin Sandoval [view email]
[v1] Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:50:51 UTC (239 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers, by Thiago Sandoval and Ufuk Topcu
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language