arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Systematic Evaluation of TabPFN-TS for Zero-Shot Probabilistic Heat Load Forecasting in District Heating Networks

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2608.20024 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Aug 2026]

Title:Systematic Evaluation of TabPFN-TS for Zero-Shot Probabilistic Heat Load Forecasting in District Heating Networks

View a PDF of the paper titled Systematic Evaluation of TabPFN-TS for Zero-Shot Probabilistic Heat Load Forecasting in District Heating Networks, by Ben Spoek and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:District heating energy hubs require reliable heat load forecasts for efficient operational scheduling. Conventional forecasting workflows train system-specific models on historical data, which can become burdensome when networks change through new consumers, retrofits, or changing operating regimes. Zero-shot time-series foundation models and in-context forecasting offer a promising alternative: they can adapt at inference time from recent observations rather than by repeated retraining. This study systematically evaluates TabPFN-TS against time-series foundation models and trained machine-learning baselines for probabilistic heat load forecasting in district heating networks. Unlike foundation models pretrained on large collections of real time series, TabPFN-TS relies on synthetic pretraining data, which avoids direct pretraining-test overlap but raises the question of whether the learned prior captures district heating dynamics. We analyze covariate choice, context length, temporal resolution, and prediction horizon on representative operating weeks, validate the selected configuration over a full year, and test transferability on a second network. The results identify hourly 24-hour forecasting with a 12-week rolling context and ambient temperature as a parsimonious high-performing configuration; longer context windows do not improve accuracy. TabPFN-TS remains close to Chronos-2 in deterministic accuracy, reaching CVRMSE values of 13.06% versus 12.48% on the main dataset, and lies within the critical-difference threshold in the daily-rank comparison. Although Chronos-2 achieves the lowest aggregate full-year error, TabPFN-TS shows better empirical calibration. Finally, the diagnostic findings motivate a Multi-Resolution Residual-Correction Forecaster that combines a low-frequency Base Forecaster with a short-horizon Residual Forecaster to improve longer-horizon planning accuracy.
Comments: 33 pages, 10 figures; supplementary information included
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.20024 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2608.20024v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20024
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ben Spoek [view email]
[v1] Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:33:37 UTC (445 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Systematic Evaluation of TabPFN-TS for Zero-Shot Probabilistic Heat Load Forecasting in District Heating Networks, by Ben Spoek and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning