Hugging Face Daily Papers · · 3 min read

The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering

Mirrored from Hugging Face Daily Papers for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Dynamic Democratic Consent: A System Dynamics Framework for Public Trust, Political Communication, and Policy Feedback</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-09-02T01:31:08.092Z","author":{"_id":"68ff12ba097442e1ad0f4125","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/68ff12ba097442e1ad0f4125/Xg-d-4fwaye5fT0F3VlIa.png","fullname":"MUHAMMAD SUKRI BIN RAMLI","name":"sukriramli","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8067877888679504},"editors":["sukriramli"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/68ff12ba097442e1ad0f4125/Xg-d-4fwaye5fT0F3VlIa.png"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.27509","authors":[{"_id":"6a977bbefe3c2f89286c38b2","name":"Muhammad Sukri Bin Ramli","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z","title":"The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"68ff12ba097442e1ad0f4125","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/68ff12ba097442e1ad0f4125/Xg-d-4fwaye5fT0F3VlIa.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"MUHAMMAD SUKRI BIN RAMLI","user":"sukriramli","type":"user","name":"sukriramli"},"summary":"Traditional frameworks of political communication operate under linear, event-driven assumptions that treat voter persuasion as a static, transactional function. This paper introduces Dynamic Consent Engineering (DCE), a novel interdisciplinary paradigm that synthesizes Edward Bernays' foundational principles of public relations with the S-E-E-D (Snowball, Equilibrium, Elasticity, Dominance) framework of system dynamics. By expanding Bernaysian operational constraints into a four-dimensional resource matrix (incorporating algorithmic media infrastructure alongside manpower, mindpower, and capital), we mathematically formalize how democratic institutions construct, optimize, and sustain political dominance. We map Bernays' classic eight-step engineering workflow directly onto non-linear feedback loops, information time lags, and demographic carrying capacities. Through rigorous modeling of systemic feedback structures, we isolate the dynamic root causes of political elasticity, policy resistance plateaus, and threshold-triggered trust collapses. Finally, we establish a four-step diagnostic pipeline and validate the framework via historical reference mode verification, demonstrating that long-term political stability depends not on ephemeral rhetoric, but on the structural synchronization of policy execution and dynamic feedback calibration.","upvotes":3,"discussionId":"6a977bbefe3c2f89286c38b3"},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"6a872c7c7d60a4f58be5acc5","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/6a872c7c7d60a4f58be5acc5/9r5l08V4eY4cPeSEpaaEO.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Finn Weber","user":"wweberfinn","type":"user"},{"_id":"6a7c39ffb4fe33bb8cafa05b","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/6a7c39ffb4fe33bb8cafa05b/aIR7OQcxrIJ02beB7ibfO.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Ingrid Weber","user":"michaelvnguyen","type":"user"},{"_id":"6a857ecfe219aaf13020f127","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/6a857ecfe219aaf13020f127/K2AEdZjsvGaavYyItm4Rn.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"अनन्या नायर","user":"Harshagarwyn","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2608/2608.27509.md","query":{}}">
Papers
arxiv:2608.27509

The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering

Published on Aug 31
· Submitted by
MUHAMMAD SUKRI BIN RAMLI
on Sep 2
Authors:

Abstract

Traditional frameworks of political communication operate under linear, event-driven assumptions that treat voter persuasion as a static, transactional function. This paper introduces Dynamic Consent Engineering (DCE), a novel interdisciplinary paradigm that synthesizes Edward Bernays' foundational principles of public relations with the S-E-E-D (Snowball, Equilibrium, Elasticity, Dominance) framework of system dynamics. By expanding Bernaysian operational constraints into a four-dimensional resource matrix (incorporating algorithmic media infrastructure alongside manpower, mindpower, and capital), we mathematically formalize how democratic institutions construct, optimize, and sustain political dominance. We map Bernays' classic eight-step engineering workflow directly onto non-linear feedback loops, information time lags, and demographic carrying capacities. Through rigorous modeling of systemic feedback structures, we isolate the dynamic root causes of political elasticity, policy resistance plateaus, and threshold-triggered trust collapses. Finally, we establish a four-step diagnostic pipeline and validate the framework via historical reference mode verification, demonstrating that long-term political stability depends not on ephemeral rhetoric, but on the structural synchronization of policy execution and dynamic feedback calibration.

Community

Paper submitter about 7 hours ago

Dynamic Democratic Consent: A System Dynamics Framework for Public Trust, Political Communication, and Policy Feedback

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.27509
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.