arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

PLSQLBench: Benchmarking LLM Systems for Executable Procedural Database Programming

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.15931 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Aug 2026]

Title:PLSQLBench: Benchmarking LLM Systems for Executable Procedural Database Programming

View a PDF of the paper titled PLSQLBench: Benchmarking LLM Systems for Executable Procedural Database Programming, by Marianne Menglin Liu and 15 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We present PLSQLBench, to our knowledge the first benchmark for evaluating whether LLMs can write executable PL/SQL programs, with correctness measured through execution-based tests. Existing LLM evaluations largely target general-purpose code generation or declarative text-to-SQL, leaving procedural database programming underexplored. PLSQLBench contains 2,865 instances: 2,594 single-turn tasks and 271 multi-turn conversations spanning 978 turns. The benchmark combines complex schema-grounded tasks over enterprise-style Spider 2 databases, simpler schema-grounded tasks derived from Spider, and MBPP-derived procedural problems, covering varying levels of database grounding and procedural complexity. Experiments with eight LLMs reveal recurring difficulties in schema grounding, PL/SQL dialect fidelity, procedural control flow, exception handling, and cross-turn consistency. Tool-augmented LLM agents improve performance on several schema-grounded evaluations, although substantial gaps remain. These results highlight procedural database programming capabilities not directly assessed by conventional code generation or text-to-SQL benchmarks. Our code is available at this https URL.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.15931 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.15931v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15931
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Marianne Menglin Liu [view email]
[v1] Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:03:21 UTC (320 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled PLSQLBench: Benchmarking LLM Systems for Executable Procedural Database Programming, by Marianne Menglin Liu and 15 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language