MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.14992 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Sep 2026]
Title:MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding
Authors:Bosi Wen, Cunxiang Wang, Jiayi Gui, Haoke Zhang, Yilin Niu, Pei Ke, Dayong Yang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
View a PDF of the paper titled MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding, by Bosi Wen and 8 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recently, the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has reshaped software engineering by enabling autonomous code agents that plan, execute, and utilize external tools iteratively to tackle complex tasks. Beyond achieving functional correctness, these agents must faithfully follow process instructions and constraints throughout the development lifecycle. However, existing benchmarks typically focus on final functional correctness or confine instruction-following evaluation to single-turn, general chat or simple code generation scenarios, leaving instruction-following in multi-turn agentic coding underexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose MTAC-IFBench, a comprehensive benchmark for this critical capability. It features multi-turn progressive software development instructions with diverse constraints spanning 6 primary and 18 secondary categories. With an average of 7.04 turns and 91.33 constraints per instance, it poses a rigorous challenge to current LLMs. To make the evaluation reliable, we construct a checklist for each constraint and functional requirement, and integrate verification scripts and judge agents to verify each checklist item. MTAC-IFBench identifies significant deficiencies in existing code agents in multi-turn instruction-following, with their performance degrading rapidly as the interaction session grows longer.
| Comments: | 23 pages, 7 figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.14992 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.14992v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14992
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding, by Bosi Wen and 8 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.