Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2606.30801 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Jun 2026]
Title:Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale
Authors:Alessandro Morosini, Sarah H. Cen, Andrew Ilyas, Hedi Driss, Aleksander Mądry, Chara Podimata
View a PDF of the paper titled Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale, by Alessandro Morosini and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Personalization algorithms determine what content users encounter on online platforms. Auditing these systems is difficult because independent auditors have only black-box access to the algorithms, while personalization depends on users' attributes, behavior, and evolving interaction histories. Existing auditing methods face a tradeoff: studies with real users capture realistic behavior but are costly and hard to control, whereas sock-puppet audits scale more easily but often rely on scripted behavior that limits realism. Beyond this, both approaches struggle to decouple user attributes from user behavior, limiting our ability to causally understand personalization. To address this gap, we introduce a framework for black-box audits of personalization algorithms using generative AI agents as behavioral engines for synthetic accounts. Each agent is instantiated with a fixed persona, grounded in demographic and political survey data, and interacts with a platform's content by reasoning about it and choosing actions. Because behavior is fixed within each persona while platform-visible signals such as age, gender, or location can be experimentally perturbed, our design enables counterfactual auditing of how platforms respond to user attributes. As a case study, we deploy 1,120 agents on X shortly after the 2024 U.S. election, spanning 14 personas and three counterfactual conditions, collecting over 200,000 content exposures. We find that X's algorithmic feed amplifies toxic, polarizing, political, and right-leaning content relative to the chronological feed, with amplification varying sharply by user ideology. Counterfactual analyses show that demographic signals affect content delivery in persona-dependent ways: pooled effects are largely null, while subgroup-level effects vary in direction and magnitude. Our work establishes GenAI-based agents as a new tool for algorithmic auditing.
| Comments: | 43 pages, 10 figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.30801 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.30801v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.30801
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Alessandro Morosini [view email][v1] Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:25:09 UTC (1,395 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale, by Alessandro Morosini and 5 other authors
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
GRPO, Dr. GRPO, and DAPO Are Three Operations on One Number: The Group-Standard-Deviation Identity
Jul 2
-
Testing Frontier Large Language Models' Physics Literacy in Parallel Physical Worlds
Jul 2
-
EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems
Jul 2
-
Mapping the Evaluation Frontier: An Empirical Survey of the Bias-Reliability Tradeoff Across Eleven Evaluator-Agent Conditions
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.