Verify when Uncertain: Beyond Self-Consistency in Black Box Hallucination Detection
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Verify when Uncertain: Beyond Self-Consistency in Black Box Hallucination Detection
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) often hallucinate, limiting their reliability in sensitive applications. In black-box settings, several self-consistency-based techniques have been proposed for hallucination detection. We empirically show that these methods perform nearly as well as a supervised (black-box) oracle, leaving limited room for further gains within this paradigm. To address this limitation, we explore cross-model consistency checking between the target model and an additional verifier LLM. With this extra information, we observe improved oracle performance compared to purely self-consistency-based methods. We then propose a budget-friendly, two-stage detection algorithm that calls the verifier model only for a subset of cases. It dynamically switches between self-consistency and cross-consistency based on an uncertainty interval of the self-consistency classifier. We provide a geometric interpretation of consistency-based hallucination detection methods through the lens of kernel mean embeddings, offering deeper theoretical insights. Extensive experiments on QA-style hallucination detection benchmarks show that this approach maintains high detection performance while significantly reducing computational cost.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2502.15845 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2502.15845v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15845
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Yihao Xue [view email][v1] Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:06:08 UTC (1,957 KB)
[v2] Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:22:53 UTC (422 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
GRPO, Dr. GRPO, and DAPO Are Three Operations on One Number: The Group-Standard-Deviation Identity
Jul 2
-
Testing Frontier Large Language Models' Physics Literacy in Parallel Physical Worlds
Jul 2
-
EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems
Jul 2
-
Mapping the Evaluation Frontier: An Empirical Survey of the Bias-Reliability Tradeoff Across Eleven Evaluator-Agent Conditions
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.