r/LocalLLaMA · · 1 min read

Qwen next 3.8 and 3.8 27b Vs Sonnet 5.5 low and Sonnet 5.5 medium.

Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Qwen next 3.8 and 3.8 27b Vs Sonnet 5.5 low and Sonnet 5.5 medium.

Six months ago, a result like this was unthinkable. But now we can say it loud and clear: local models are at the cutting edge, and the gap of just a few months has been confirmed.

Personally, I use Qwen-Next 3.8 for complex tasks; today, GPT-Sol-6-High was messing up a project, but Qwen-Next got it back on track. I consider it a reliable benchmark. What’s your take?

submitted by /u/LegacyRemaster
[link] [comments]

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from r/LocalLLaMA