The Price of Reasoning: Cost-Quality Tradeoffs in Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translation
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:The Price of Reasoning: Cost-Quality Tradeoffs in Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translation
Abstract:Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been established as a viable paradigm for the post-training of Large Language Models (LLMs), including downstream tasks, such as Neural Machine Translation (NMT). With the latest research indicating that RLVR could be the preferred training method for translating legal documents due to the induced reasoning capabilities, it raises the question whether it is really attributed to the reasoning or more generally to the training paradigm. We investigate the importance of including the model's reasoning trace in the generated responses during both training and inference by systematically omitting it from one of the phases. Our experiments show that including the reasoning, specifically during inference, has a positive effect on the overall translation quality. Furthermore, we recognise that the reasoning leads to an increase in output tokens, hence we study the cost-quality tradeoff between the increased computational demands and the improved translation quality.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.19226 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.19226v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.19226
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Journal reference: | Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng '26) |
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1145/3820755.3833407
DOI(s) linking to related resources
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.