Should ArXiv backtrack endorsement? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
ArXiv has an endorsement system for a reason. I would only offer endorsement to whom I have direct academic collaboration or mentorship with, since I'm putting my own academic reputation on the stake. This is also the standard of almost any serious academic researcher I am aware of.
Now ArXiv is making effort to crack down AI slop and banning accounts uploading low-quality research papers, which is a great initiative. By definition of an "endorsement", I wish ArXiv could backtrack and at least issue warnings to their endorsers, and if this happens multiple times (let's say three), people giving out careless endorsement should also face consequences.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
How papers are selected for Best Paper, Oral, or Highlight presentation at major ML/CV conferences such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, and ICLR? [D]
Jul 2
-
BMVC 2026 Review Discussion Thread [D]
Jul 2
-
Has anyone tried this approach with Fast Byte Latent Transformers ? [R]
Jul 2
-
Books/Resources to improve mathematical foundations for ML research [D]
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.