Hugging Face Daily Papers · · 5 min read

FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis

Mirrored from Hugging Face Daily Papers for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Training terminal agents requires scalable executable supervision, yet synthesizing high-quality terminal tasks remains challenging. Each task couples an instruction, an initialized environment, a reference solution, and an executable verifier; if these artifacts are generated from inconsistent assumptions, the resulting task may be unsolvable or incorrectly evaluated. Meanwhile, multi-stage synthesis can discard the goals, dependencies, state transitions, and procedural constraints encoded in the original sources. We present FACET (Fine-grained Agentic Construction of Executable Tasks), a framework that addresses both information preservation and cross-artifact consistency. FACET reconstructs related agent skills into coherent, information-rich scenarios, then realizes and repairs the execution environment before generating the final task artifacts. The resulting container state serves as shared grounding for the instruction, solution, and verifier, while execution-based validation and targeted repair correct artifact-specific failures without unnecessarily regenerating valid components. FACET produces complex terminal tasks with dense executable checks, and successful trajectories collected from these tasks provide effective, data-efficient supervision. Fine-tuning models across multiple scales consistently improves performance on Terminal-Bench 2.1, while analyses of alternative generation schemes support the importance of environment-grounded construction for task validity and solution-verifier alignment. These results establish source-intent preservation and shared executable-state grounding as key principles for scalable terminal-task synthesis.</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-08-20T00:59:16.204Z","author":{"_id":"68a7d843ac4c72b9877b54b5","avatarUrl":"/avatars/7648ed4dbb4f3a209a8f62af7803b85f.svg","fullname":"Kou Shi","name":"KouShi2","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":1,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.847507655620575},"editors":["KouShi2"],"editorAvatarUrls":["/avatars/7648ed4dbb4f3a209a8f62af7803b85f.svg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.18580","authors":[{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e04","name":"Kou Shi","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e05","name":"Zun Wang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e06","name":"Qisheng Su","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e07","name":"Shiting Huang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e08","name":"Ziao Zhang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e09","name":"Zhen Fang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e0a","name":"Qingnan Ren","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e0b","name":"Jin Liu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e0c","name":"Yu Zeng","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e0d","name":"Yiming Zhao","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e0e","name":"Lin Chen","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e0f","name":"Zehui Chen","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a865123db13816030683e10","name":"Feng Zhao","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z","title":"FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"68a7d843ac4c72b9877b54b5","avatarUrl":"/avatars/7648ed4dbb4f3a209a8f62af7803b85f.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Kou Shi","user":"KouShi2","type":"user","name":"KouShi2"},"summary":"Training terminal agents requires scalable executable supervision, yet synthesizing high-quality terminal tasks remains challenging. Each task couples an instruction, an initialized environment, a reference solution, and an executable verifier; if these artifacts are generated from inconsistent assumptions, the resulting task may be unsolvable or incorrectly evaluated. Meanwhile, multi-stage synthesis can discard the goals, dependencies, state transitions, and procedural constraints encoded in the original sources. We present FACET (Fine-grained Agentic Construction of Executable Tasks), a framework that addresses both information preservation and cross-artifact consistency. FACET reconstructs related agent skills into coherent, information-rich scenarios, then realizes and repairs the execution environment before generating the final task artifacts. The resulting container state serves as shared grounding for the instruction, solution, and verifier, while execution-based validation and targeted repair correct artifact-specific failures without unnecessarily regenerating valid components. FACET produces complex terminal tasks with dense executable checks, and successful trajectories collected from these tasks provide effective, data-efficient supervision. Fine-tuning models across multiple scales consistently improves performance on Terminal-Bench 2.1, while analyses of alternative generation schemes support the importance of environment-grounded construction for task validity and solution-verifier alignment. These results establish source-intent preservation and shared executable-state grounding as key principles for scalable terminal-task synthesis.","upvotes":1,"discussionId":"6a865123db13816030683e11","projectPage":"https://stokou.github.io/FACET-Terminal/","githubRepo":"https://github.com/StoKou/FACET-Terminal","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"FACET constructs executable terminal tasks by preserving source intent and grounding instructions, solutions, and verifiers in a shared repaired environment to enable scalable agent training.","ai_keywords":["terminal agents","executable supervision","cross-artifact consistency","agent skills","execution environment","container state","execution-based validation","Terminal-Bench 2.1","source-intent preservation","shared executable-state grounding"],"ai_summary_model":"thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small","githubStars":2},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7/g6EX7diOpuA94R2ab-rZC.png","isPro":true,"fullname":"Dipankar Sarkar","user":"dipankarsarkar","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2608/2608.18580.md","query":{}}">
Papers
arxiv:2608.18580

FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis

Published on Aug 19
· Submitted by
Kou Shi
on Aug 19
Authors:
,

Abstract

FACET constructs executable terminal tasks by preserving source intent and grounding instructions, solutions, and verifiers in a shared repaired environment to enable scalable agent training.

Training terminal agents requires scalable executable supervision, yet synthesizing high-quality terminal tasks remains challenging. Each task couples an instruction, an initialized environment, a reference solution, and an executable verifier; if these artifacts are generated from inconsistent assumptions, the resulting task may be unsolvable or incorrectly evaluated. Meanwhile, multi-stage synthesis can discard the goals, dependencies, state transitions, and procedural constraints encoded in the original sources. We present FACET (Fine-grained Agentic Construction of Executable Tasks), a framework that addresses both information preservation and cross-artifact consistency. FACET reconstructs related agent skills into coherent, information-rich scenarios, then realizes and repairs the execution environment before generating the final task artifacts. The resulting container state serves as shared grounding for the instruction, solution, and verifier, while execution-based validation and targeted repair correct artifact-specific failures without unnecessarily regenerating valid components. FACET produces complex terminal tasks with dense executable checks, and successful trajectories collected from these tasks provide effective, data-efficient supervision. Fine-tuning models across multiple scales consistently improves performance on Terminal-Bench 2.1, while analyses of alternative generation schemes support the importance of environment-grounded construction for task validity and solution-verifier alignment. These results establish source-intent preservation and shared executable-state grounding as key principles for scalable terminal-task synthesis.

Community

Paper submitter about 1 hour ago

Training terminal agents requires scalable executable supervision, yet synthesizing high-quality terminal tasks remains challenging. Each task couples an instruction, an initialized environment, a reference solution, and an executable verifier; if these artifacts are generated from inconsistent assumptions, the resulting task may be unsolvable or incorrectly evaluated. Meanwhile, multi-stage synthesis can discard the goals, dependencies, state transitions, and procedural constraints encoded in the original sources. We present FACET (Fine-grained Agentic Construction of Executable Tasks), a framework that addresses both information preservation and cross-artifact consistency. FACET reconstructs related agent skills into coherent, information-rich scenarios, then realizes and repairs the execution environment before generating the final task artifacts. The resulting container state serves as shared grounding for the instruction, solution, and verifier, while execution-based validation and targeted repair correct artifact-specific failures without unnecessarily regenerating valid components. FACET produces complex terminal tasks with dense executable checks, and successful trajectories collected from these tasks provide effective, data-efficient supervision. Fine-tuning models across multiple scales consistently improves performance on Terminal-Bench 2.1, while analyses of alternative generation schemes support the importance of environment-grounded construction for task validity and solution-verifier alignment. These results establish source-intent preservation and shared executable-state grounding as key principles for scalable terminal-task synthesis.

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.18580
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from Hugging Face Daily Papers