Routing Is Not Enough: Diagnosing Intra-Adapter Subspace Contention in MoE+LoRA Fine-Tuning
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2609.03150 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]
Title:Routing Is Not Enough: Diagnosing Intra-Adapter Subspace Contention in MoE+LoRA Fine-Tuning
Authors:Mehreen Hossain Chowdhury, Nowshin Mahjabin, Ahmed Shafin Ruhan, Md Azam Hossain, Abu Raihan Mostofa Kamal, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar
View a PDF of the paper titled Routing Is Not Enough: Diagnosing Intra-Adapter Subspace Contention in MoE+LoRA Fine-Tuning, by Mehreen Hossain Chowdhury and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multi-domain fine-tuning often combines MoE routing with LoRA, assuming that token-level routing separates domain-specific updates. We test this assumption in MoE+LoRA using Python code paired with biomedical text and mathematical reasoning. Although these domains show near-disjoint expert routing, adding biomedical data substantially increases code perplexity, indicating that routing separation alone may not prevent negative transfer. To localize the failure, we introduce Jaccard routing overlap and adapter-gradient cosine similarity, which measure expert sharing and update compatibility, respectively. These diagnostics indicate that interference arises mostly from nearly orthogonal domain gradients competing within the same low-rank adapter subspace. We address this issue with SpawnLoRA, which dynamically adds gated sub-adapters inside MoE experts when adapter-level contention is detected, while keeping the router fixed. We evaluate SpawnLoRA on Phi-tiny-MoE-instruct and OLMoE-1B-7B across multiple mixture settings and find that it effectively reduces negative transfer compared with standard and rank-adaptive LoRA. These results demonstrate that structural separation inside experts provides benefits beyond routing or rank expansion alone.
| Comments: | 13 pages, 1 figure, 16 tables. Accepted to Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026 |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.03150 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.03150v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03150
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Routing Is Not Enough: Diagnosing Intra-Adapter Subspace Contention in MoE+LoRA Fine-Tuning, by Mehreen Hossain Chowdhury and 5 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.