arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.26779 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Aug 2026]

Title:Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning, by Seohyeong Lee and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Preference learning optimizes models using response pairs, yet the informativeness of these pairs is fundamentally shaped by the instructions from which they are generated. We identify instruction quality as a hidden bottleneck in preference learning: low-quality or ambiguous instructions restrict the response-quality distribution, limiting strong chosen responses and weakening preference signals. Through Best- and Worst-of-N analyses, we show that instruction quality constrains both the ceiling and floor of sampled response quality. Motivated by this observation, we introduce an instruction-refinement pipeline that selects weak instructions using reward signals and revises them with rubric-guided LLM feedback, improving preference data without discarding examples. Across offline and online preference learning settings, experiments on multiple models and benchmarks show broad alignment improvements over original data and alternative data-improvement strategies. Further analyses indicate that instruction refinement raises achievable response quality and complements response-centric preference data curation. Overall, instruction quality emerges as a key factor governing how informative preference signals are formed for LLM alignment. Code is available at: this https URL
Comments: Preprint
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.26779 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.26779v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26779
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Seohyeong Lee [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 08:09:36 UTC (907 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning, by Seohyeong Lee and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language