arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Lookahead-R: Budget-Aware Tool Retrieval via Execution-Centric Planning

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.35811 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Sep 2026]

Title:Lookahead-R: Budget-Aware Tool Retrieval via Execution-Centric Planning

View a PDF of the paper titled Lookahead-R: Budget-Aware Tool Retrieval via Execution-Centric Planning, by Zongze Wu and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Tool retrieval is a critical bottleneck for LLM-based agents operating over large, heterogeneous API ecosystems. Existing approaches face an inherent trade-off: semantic retrievers are fast but suffer from the semantic-functional gap, while execution-based validation improves precision at the cost of prohibitive latency. We propose Lookahead-R, a planning-based framework that reformulates tool retrieval as a resource-constrained sequential decision-making problem. At its core, Lookahead-R introduces a lightweight execution-aware surrogate world model that jointly predicts tool execution success, latency cost, and semantic utility---without invoking real APIs. This world model drives a cost-sensitive, uncertainty-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search that navigates the tool space under strict budget constraints. Evaluated on the large-scale ToolBench benchmark, Lookahead-R achieves a superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off across all test scenarios. On the most challenging I3 split, it attains an NDCG@5 of 91.40\%, outperforming the state-of-the-art ToolGen (90.16\%) by 1.24\%. Ablation studies confirm that explicit latency modeling is the key discriminative signal for identifying high-quality tools under resource constraints.
Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables. Published in ICMR 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.35811 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.35811v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35811
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3805622.3810632
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Zongze Wu [view email]
[v1] Sun, 20 Sep 2026 07:59:54 UTC (864 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language