arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

The Advantages of Fresh Sketching for Ridge Regression

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.38565 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Sep 2026]

Title:The Advantages of Fresh Sketching for Ridge Regression

View a PDF of the paper titled The Advantages of Fresh Sketching for Ridge Regression, by Linkai Ma and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Over the past 25 years, sketching and sampling have become widely used tools for accelerating large-scale regression. In iterative randomized solvers, a basic design choice is whether to $\textit{reuse}$ the same sketch or draw $\textit{fresh}$ randomness at every step. For (under-constrained) iterative ridge regression with column sampling, whether fresh sketches offer provable advantages has remained open: $\textit{We show that they do.}$ Fresh sketching lets us analyze error only along the current residual solution, rather than uniformly over the entire Gram matrix. This directional view yields sharper convergence guarantees for leverage score and ridge leverage score sampling and, more importantly, leads to residual-aware sampling rules. By minimizing the variance of the relevant sketched matrix-vector product, we derive an oracle distribution and practical approximations to the oracle distribution, including a mixture sampling distribution with (somewhat weaker) convergence guarantees. Experiments on synthetic and real data, including ridge probes on Qwen2.5 representations, support our theory, showing substantially faster convergence.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.38565 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.38565v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38565
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Linkai Ma [view email]
[v1] Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:24:22 UTC (437 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning