arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Student-Guided Teacher Distillation for Efficient LLM Task Routing: Positioning Against Jev-Style System-1 Classifiers

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.02516 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Oct 2026]

Title:Student-Guided Teacher Distillation for Efficient LLM Task Routing: Positioning Against Jev-Style System-1 Classifiers

View a PDF of the paper titled Student-Guided Teacher Distillation for Efficient LLM Task Routing: Positioning Against Jev-Style System-1 Classifiers, by Haifeng Wu and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Zero-shot classifiers are useful for routing user requests to specialized LLM tasks, but scoring every request against a large candidate set is expensive: a zero-shot NLI classifier must evaluate one premise-hypothesis pair per label, so cost scales linearly with taxonomy size. We study a student-guided teacher distillation pipeline for a fixed taxonomy of 60 LLM task categories: a compact ModernBERT classifier predicts the full category distribution in one forward pass and retrieves a small top-k candidate set, and a larger DeBERTa-v3 zero-shot NLI classifier reranks only those candidates rather than all 60 labels; the resulting teacher labels iteratively improve the student, which produces sharper candidates for the next round. Unlike generic embedding retrieval or clustering-derived shortlists used in extreme multi-label classification, our candidate generator is trained end-to-end on the target taxonomy and is the same model serving production traffic, distinguishing it from LLM-routing work that routes between candidate models, and from concurrent System-1 encoder-classifier proposals (e.g. TypeSafe AI's Jev and the open-source Laya project) whose training methodology is undocumented or RL-based. Our best student checkpoint reaches 77.5% teacher agreement on a 200-example evaluation set, and preliminary coverage measurements show Coverage@16 of 91-100%, suggesting top-k sets retain most of the teacher's decision-relevant information. We further show truncated top-k teacher scores should not be treated as full 60-class soft targets for KL distillation: zeroing untruncated classes destroys the dark knowledge soft-label distillation depends on, introducing systematic bias rather than a harmless sparse approximation. A complete evaluation, including coverage at multiple k on a held-out set, an embedding-retrieval baseline, and a larger human-reviewed test set, remains in progress.
Comments: 13 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.6
Cite as: arXiv:2610.02516 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.02516v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02516
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Haifeng Wu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 21:38:11 UTC (17 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Student-Guided Teacher Distillation for Efficient LLM Task Routing: Positioning Against Jev-Style System-1 Classifiers, by Haifeng Wu and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning