arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.00597 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]

Title:Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction

Authors:Jisen Li (1 and 2), Bingxuan Li (1), Nanyi Jiang (3), Xuying Ning (1), Xiyao Wang (3), Yifan Shen (1), Heng Wang (1), Yuqing Jian (2), Xiaoxia Wu (2), Ben Athiwaratkun (2), Pan Lu (4), Jiaxuan You (1), Bingxin Zhao (3) ((1) University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, (2) Together AI, (3) University of Pennsylvania, (4) Stanford University)
View a PDF of the paper titled Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction, by Jisen Li (1 and 2) and 15 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Scientific literature search often requires more than retrieving papers from a single query: users' intents are underspecified, preference-dependent, and evolve through interaction. Existing search agents typically rely on fixed pipelines or implicit language-only reasoning, making their search strategies difficult to control, inspect, and refine. We introduce PaperPilot, a multi-turn literature search agent that frames scientific search as workflow induction. Given an anchor paper and a user query, PaperPilot constructs an executable DAG of paper-search operators, including keyword search, citation expansion, filtering, scoring, reranking, and evidence extraction. User feedback is then used to refine both the query and the workflow itself. We train PaperPilot with supervised workflow imitation and preference optimization over controlled workflow corruptions. Experiments show that PaperPilot-9B improves over the base Qwen3.5-9B toolset agent under multi-turn interaction, increasing Hit@5 from 58.0 to 77.0, MRR from 47.5 to 59.4, and nDCG@10 from 26.8 to 32.5, while reducing workflow execution errors from 9.5% to 0%. These results show that explicit, editable search workflows provide an effective and controllable interface for aligning literature search agents with complex scientific intent.
Comments: 17 pages, 12 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.00597 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.00597v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.00597
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jisen Li [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:21:23 UTC (988 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language