Self-evolving agents promise to improve through interaction. Yet most benchmarks keep execution conditions fixed.</p>\n<p>Adaptation matters when past success stops working. If the environment changes, can an agent recover? Introducing PACE-Bench.</p>\n<p>Code & Benchmark: <a href=\"https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench</a><br>Project: <a href=\"https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench</a><br>Paper: <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.14441\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.14441</a></p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-08-18T03:25:01.831Z","author":{"_id":"64c5e944979493279b700cb2","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/noauth/vjFuPWw8Vl7b7gXB19Sk-.jpeg","fullname":"Bingxiang He","name":"hbx","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":8,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8126267194747925},"editors":["hbx"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/noauth/vjFuPWw8Vl7b7gXB19Sk-.jpeg"],"reactions":[{"reaction":"🚀","users":["hbx"],"count":1}],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.14441","authors":[{"_id":"6a826e90b601d59c652813d3","name":"Yuhao Zhan","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a826e90b601d59c652813d4","name":"Bingxiang He","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a826e90b601d59c652813d5","name":"Zecong Tang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a826e90b601d59c652813d6","name":"Chaojun Xiao","hidden":false}],"mediaUrls":["https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/64c5e944979493279b700cb2/qKMFCG3P_puUtPiEzpSbM.gif"],"publishedAt":"2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z","title":"PACE-Bench: Benchmarking Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution in Dynamic Environments","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"64c5e944979493279b700cb2","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/noauth/vjFuPWw8Vl7b7gXB19Sk-.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Bingxiang He","user":"hbx","type":"user","name":"hbx"},"summary":"Self-evolving agents improve future behavior from interaction experience, yet existing evaluations typically optimize under fixed execution conditions and do not test recovery after those conditions change. To address this gap, we introduce PACE-Bench (Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution), a simulator-grounded benchmark of 144 source-to-target adaptation pairs across six physics domains. Each pair links a source environment to a mutated target environment with the same goal and interface. A code-driven design that succeeds in the source fails in the target, where agents must iteratively adapt it into a working target design using diagnostic sandbox feedback within a limited attempt budget. We compare ten self-evolving methods from four paradigms. The benchmark remains far from saturated: Reflexion + Qwen3-14B succeeds on only 35.9\\% of full-benchmark pairs, while GPT-5.5 solves 66.7\\% of the Statics subset under the full budget. Together, these results show that simulator-grounded reflection is more reliable than unverified self-revision, while memory anchors agents to early designs and broad tree search explores without converging. Even revealing exact physical changes does not raise the performance ceiling, pointing to mechanism redesign rather than parameter inference as the central bottleneck. Data and code are available at https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench.","upvotes":3,"discussionId":"6a826e90b601d59c652813d7","projectPage":"https://thunlp.github.io/PACE-Bench/","githubRepo":"https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"PACE-Bench evaluates self-evolving agents on physics adaptation tasks requiring iterative code redesign after environmental mutations, revealing that simulator-grounded reflection outperforms unverified self-revision but mechanism redesign remains a major bottleneck.","ai_keywords":["self-evolving agents","PACE-Bench","simulator-grounded benchmark","code-driven design","diagnostic sandbox feedback","Reflexion","memory anchors","tree search","mechanism redesign"],"ai_summary_model":"thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small","githubStars":2,"organization":{"_id":"6904703d1c4c3a34bf765739","name":"TsinghuaNLP","fullname":"Tsinghua NLP Group","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/60965a5d206218bf2b0e00ae/4_JDQKsQDyLK0oGegQCl7.png"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"64c5e944979493279b700cb2","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/noauth/vjFuPWw8Vl7b7gXB19Sk-.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Bingxiang He","user":"hbx","type":"user"},{"_id":"63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7/g6EX7diOpuA94R2ab-rZC.png","isPro":true,"fullname":"Dipankar Sarkar","user":"dipankarsarkar","type":"user"},{"_id":"660cc5ab24b3f2732d08d34b","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/660cc5ab24b3f2732d08d34b/WSPHm7_5NiPe6CNsoJY7V.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Yuhao Zhan","user":"YuhaoZhan","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"organization":{"_id":"6904703d1c4c3a34bf765739","name":"TsinghuaNLP","fullname":"Tsinghua NLP Group","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/60965a5d206218bf2b0e00ae/4_JDQKsQDyLK0oGegQCl7.png"},"query":{}}">
PACE-Bench: Benchmarking Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution in Dynamic Environments
Abstract
PACE-Bench evaluates self-evolving agents on physics adaptation tasks requiring iterative code redesign after environmental mutations, revealing that simulator-grounded reflection outperforms unverified self-revision but mechanism redesign remains a major bottleneck.
Self-evolving agents improve future behavior from interaction experience, yet existing evaluations typically optimize under fixed execution conditions and do not test recovery after those conditions change. To address this gap, we introduce PACE-Bench (Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution), a simulator-grounded benchmark of 144 source-to-target adaptation pairs across six physics domains. Each pair links a source environment to a mutated target environment with the same goal and interface. A code-driven design that succeeds in the source fails in the target, where agents must iteratively adapt it into a working target design using diagnostic sandbox feedback within a limited attempt budget. We compare ten self-evolving methods from four paradigms. The benchmark remains far from saturated: Reflexion + Qwen3-14B succeeds on only 35.9\% of full-benchmark pairs, while GPT-5.5 solves 66.7\% of the Statics subset under the full budget. Together, these results show that simulator-grounded reflection is more reliable than unverified self-revision, while memory anchors agents to early designs and broad tree search explores without converging. Even revealing exact physical changes does not raise the performance ceiling, pointing to mechanism redesign rather than parameter inference as the central bottleneck. Data and code are available at https://github.com/thunlp/PACE-Bench.
Community
Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14441 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14441 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.