arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Memory Depth and Reconstructed Context Width: A Controlled Evaluation of Hierarchical Retrieval

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2610.08300 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Oct 2026]

Title:Memory Depth and Reconstructed Context Width: A Controlled Evaluation of Hierarchical Retrieval

View a PDF of the paper titled Memory Depth and Reconstructed Context Width: A Controlled Evaluation of Hierarchical Retrieval, by Michael Andreev
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Long-term conversational memory is becoming an integral component of modern LLM systems. Proposed architectures group records by topics and events, construct hierarchies and graphs, and connect facts through causal and temporal relations. We experimentally study the interaction between two memory parameters: structural depth and the width of context supplied to the answer model. Using EverMemBench, we evaluate depths D1-D4, core budgets of 1,024/2,048/4,096 tokens, and additional Production and Oracle conditions up to the full archive. Increasing width from 1K to 4K improves Accuracy by 10.11-17.98 percentage points, whereas increasing depth provides no monotonic gain. Beyond 8-16K, Production performance reaches a plateau while tokens per correct answer continue to increase; Oracle preserves quality on full archives of 68-71K tokens. These results motivate further investigation of large, coherent context blocks instead of progressively deeper memory structures.
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure. Accepted at the PALM Workshop at NeurIPS 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.08300 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2610.08300v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08300
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Michael Andreev [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 13:04:43 UTC (35 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language