Prompt-engineering paper accepted to ICML [R]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
"Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversity"
This paper was accepted to ICML this year. Its main idea is a very simple prompt-engineering trick: "changing the prompt this way led to more diverse sampling". Naturally, it is difficult to provide a rigorous theoretical analysis for something like this.
Even if it works, I’m not sure this kind of prompt engineering belongs at a top-tier machine learning conference. Some people seems to call this kind of work “modern machine learning”, but I think it should be categorized as less technical venues.
How do you think? Am I being too rigid?
[link] [comments]
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.