For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Hello,
I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms.
Any insight is welcome, thank you!
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
I turned my dog Jackies Brain into a working AI [P]
Oct 14
-
Event2Vec: additive event embeddings where a linear score on a history decomposes exactly into per-event terms [P]
Oct 14
-
Binary noise classification using CRNN mean teacher algo [R]
Oct 14
-
Localized Neural learning vs backpropagation [D]
Oct 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.