GRAFT: Adaptive DLM-Based Draft Tree Construction with Target-Distilled Edge Scoring
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:GRAFT: Adaptive DLM-Based Draft Tree Construction with Target-Distilled Edge Scoring
Abstract:Tree-based speculative decoding raises the mean accepted tokens of standard speculative decoding by verifying multiple draft paths, and existing tree builders typically construct these paths through parent-conditioned expansion, where each child token is generated conditioned on its parent path. This construction is incompatible with diffusion language model (DLM) drafters such as DFlash, which produces all future-position distributions in a single forward pass. DDTree bridges this gap by treating high-probability tokens from each future-position distribution as candidate nodes and selecting edges between consecutive positions under a fixed node budget. However, its edge selection relies on token probability alone without modeling parent--child compatibility, so target-compatible tokens can be attached to wrong parents; moreover, its fixed budget ignores that the throughput-optimal tree size varies with the decoding state. We propose GRAFT, a draft-tree construction framework for DLM-based speculative decoding. GRAFT introduces Target-Distilled Edge Scoring (TDES), which distills parent--child preferences from target-model traces to select target-compatible edges, and State-Aware Budget Allocation (SABA), which sets the per-round tree budget by balancing expected draft gain against verification cost. Across multiple models and tasks, GRAFT achieves $2.13\times$--$6.36\times$ end-to-end speedup over autoregressive decoding while adding less than $0.5$\,ms of overhead per round, approximately $1.4\%$ of the target-model verification latency.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.20375 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.20375v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20375
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.