When Citations Mislead? A Claim-Level Benchmark for Legal Hallucination Detection
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2610.10971 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Oct 2026]
Title:When Citations Mislead? A Claim-Level Benchmark for Legal Hallucination Detection
View a PDF of the paper titled When Citations Mislead? A Claim-Level Benchmark for Legal Hallucination Detection, by M. Mikail Demir and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used in legal research and drafting, but they can still produce claims that sound convincing without being supported by the cited source. We introduce PARCEL, a benchmark for checking whether a legal claim is supported by the underlying authority. Using recent New York State Court of Appeals decisions, we build a dataset of 3,396 parenthetical-style claims labeled as Supported, Refuted, or Not Found. We cast this task as a three-way natural language inference problem and evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs in a zero-shot setting. Although the strongest models reach up to 0.97 accuracy, the results also show an important weakness: models still incorrectly mark unsupported claims as supported, even when the full opinion text is provided. Across models, missing support is harder to detect than direct contradiction, and fabricated but plausible citations cause the largest drop in performance. Overall, PARCEL provides a practical benchmark for testing claim-level groundedness in legal RAG systems.
| Comments: | 9 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Published in the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2026), Singapore. Dataset: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; J.1 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.10971 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2610.10971v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10971
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Journal reference: | In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2026), June 08-12, 2026, Singapore. ACM, New York, NY, USA |
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1145/3836937.3836948
DOI(s) linking to related resources
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled When Citations Mislead? A Claim-Level Benchmark for Legal Hallucination Detection, by M. Mikail Demir and 1 other authors
Additional Features
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.