Nothing Changed but the Model: CellFill -- Bounded In-Cell Learning for Bit-Identical, Revocable Updates to Quantized LLMs
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2608.20873 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Aug 2026]
Title:Nothing Changed but the Model: CellFill -- Bounded In-Cell Learning for Bit-Identical, Revocable Updates to Quantized LLMs
View a PDF of the paper titled Nothing Changed but the Model: CellFill -- Bounded In-Cell Learning for Bit-Identical, Revocable Updates to Quantized LLMs, by Zifeng Liu and 6 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Every way of teaching a deployed language model something new -- full fine-tuning, adapter merging, model editing -- replaces the released checkpoint, and with it every evaluation and cache that referred to those exact bits. We instead learn inside the dequantization gap: with the integer codes and scales of a 4-bit release frozen, new knowledge is written only into the per-weight residual that lives strictly inside each quantization decision cell. Re-quantization then returns the released artifact bit-for-bit, a machine-checkable guarantee; updates are exactly revocable by dropping the residual; and drift is bounded. We give six propositions and three training paths, including CellFill, a bounded reparameterization that makes invariance structural rather than enforced.
Exact invariance turns out to be nearly free: across three paired seeds the constrained dense path matches an unconstrained reference whose weights provably escape the artifact (58.9 vs 59.3 percent fact recall; paired difference -0.5 points, 95% CI [-5.0,+4.0]), and is better on held-out cross-domain perplexity. Against the natural null hypothesis -- serving the same update as an unmerged adapter -- projecting into the cells reduces cross-domain forgetting in every run that converged, and a diverged control shows the boundary: projection is a trust region, not a repair. What no method escapes is the cost of knowledge itself, and the apparent free lunch of in-domain perplexity improving past the anchor is an artifact of rehearsal sharing a corpus with the metric. Methods differ threefold at matched rehearsal in knowledge bought per point of cross-domain perplexity, a ranking that is not the recall ranking. The method transfers to a 27B hybrid linear-attention model (2.4e10 constrained weights, verified bit-identical), where matched recall costs about half as much cross-domain perplexity as at 1.7B.
| Comments: | 35 pages, 3 figures, 9 tables |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.20873 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.20873v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20873
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Nothing Changed but the Model: CellFill -- Bounded In-Cell Learning for Bit-Identical, Revocable Updates to Quantized LLMs, by Zifeng Liu and 6 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
SLM-Conditioned Hierarchical Relation Routing for Labeled Property Graph Learning
Aug 28
-
NeuronFuzz: Safety Neuron Guided Fuzzing for LLM Safety Evaluation
Aug 28
-
Pruning Binarized Neural Networks: A Dedicated Framework and Globally Weighted Algorithms
Aug 28
-
Muon with Finite Newton-Schulz: The Smoothing Benefit in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.