Denser $\neq$ Better: Limits of On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Post-Training
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Denser $\neq$ Better: Limits of On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Post-Training
Abstract:Continual post-training enables foundation models to acquire new knowledge while preserving existing capabilities. Recent work suggests that on-policy learning can mitigate forgetting, with on-policy self-distillation emerging as a particularly attractive approach. In this work, we revisit this optimistic view through self-distillation policy optimization (SDPO). Our experiments show that SDPO can accelerate in-domain specialization when teacher signals are stable and well aligned, but it struggles to generalize to out-of-distribution scenarios. In continual post-training, SDPO exhibits stronger forgetting and can even collapse, whereas on-policy reinforcement learning methods such as GRPO adapt more conservatively and better preserve prior capabilities. Further analyses reveal that denser self-distillation induces larger drift in both parameter space and response space, and can amplify high-frequency formatting artifacts through a self-reinforcing teacher--student loop. These findings suggest that on-policy data alone is insufficient for continual learning. Dense self-distillation can accelerate specialization when teacher targets are stable and token-level supervision is reliable, but it should not be treated as a default stabilizer for continual post-training. Our code is available at this https URL.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.01763 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.01763v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.01763
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Black-Box Inference of LLM Architectural Properties with Restrictive API Access
Jul 3
-
On the Utility and Factual Reliability of Pruned Mixture-of-Experts Models in the Biomedical Domain
Jul 3
-
Multi-Head Recurrent Memory Agents
Jul 3
-
BOUNDARY_SYNC: Measuring Communication-Induced Representational Coupling in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Jul 3
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.