The Intrinsic Dimension of Prompts in Internal Representations of Large Language Models
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:The Intrinsic Dimension of Prompts in Internal Representations of Large Language Models
Abstract:We study the geometry of token representations at the prompt level in large language models through the lens of intrinsic dimension. Viewing transformers as mean-field particle systems, we estimate the intrinsic dimension of the empirical measure at each layer and demonstrate that it correlates with next-token uncertainty. Across models and intrinsic dimension estimators, we find that intrinsic dimension peaks in early to middle layers and increases under syntactic and semantic disruption (by shuffling tokens), and that it is strongly correlated with average surprisal, with a simple analysis linking logits geometry to entropy via softmax. As a case study in practical interpretability and safety, we train a linear probe on the per-layer intrinsic dimension profile to distinguish malicious from benign prompts before generation. This probe achieves accuracy of 90 to 95\% in different datasets, outperforming widely used guardrails such as Llama Guard and Shield Gemma. We further compare against linear probes built from layerwise entropy derived via the Tuned Lens and find that the intrinsic dimension-based probe is competitive and complementary, offering a compact, interpretable signal distributed across layers. Our findings suggest that prompt-level geometry provides actionable signals for monitoring and controlling LLM behavior, and offers a bridge between mechanistic insights and practical safety tools.
| Comments: | 12+14 pages, 18 figures, matches published version on Transactions of Machine Learning Research |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2501.10573 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2501.10573v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.10573
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
|
| Journal reference: | Transactions of Machine Learning Research, ISSN: 2835-8856, 2026, https://openreview.net/pdf?id=rBEgNAslpY |
Submission history
From: Matteo Biagetti [view email][v1] Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:02:17 UTC (8,562 KB)
[v2] Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:01:13 UTC (8,350 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.