arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Harnessing LLMs as Agents: What Does It Cost?

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.02488 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Oct 2026]

Title:Harnessing LLMs as Agents: What Does It Cost?

Authors:Zelin Zhao (Georgia Institute of Technology), Xinyu Guo (Georgia Institute of Technology), Jingyuan Zhang (Georgia Institute of Technology), Yuxuan Zhang (Etude AI), Yongxin Chen (Georgia Institute of Technology)
View a PDF of the paper titled Harnessing LLMs as Agents: What Does It Cost?, by Zelin Zhao (Georgia Institute of Technology) and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Language-model agents increasingly rely on harnesses that manage bounded context, persistent memory, tools, verification, and repeated execution, yet existing notions of model capability do not quantify the computational resources these mechanisms consume. We introduce the Language Model Agent Machine (LAM), a resource-bounded abstraction that fixes the underlying semantic model while explicitly charging harness-level resources. We establish four classes of results. Communication: LAM execution is instancewise equivalent to red--blue pebbling under simultaneous call--transfer budgets, transferring classical I/O lower bounds to context--memory traffic. Access: memory interfaces induce asymptotic separations, including a $\Theta(n)$ gap between random and non-speculative sequential access on pointer chasing. Recomputation: bit-reversal DAGs require $\Theta(n^2/(C+S)+n)$ model calls with context capacity $C$ and persistent-memory capacity $S$, quantifying when stored intermediate state avoids repeated semantic computation. Reliability: we derive tight stage-local sampling bounds, exact imperfect-verification costs, and a Young--Daly-type checkpoint law with a closed-form optimal verification interval. Controlled and held-out experiments on GPT-6 Astra test communication and reliability predictions, including checkpoint optima, policy selection under programmatic checking, and tradeoffs among call granularity, logical input traffic, and reliability on chained MATH tasks. Together, these results provide a resource theory for the computational cost of language-model agent harnesses.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.02488 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.02488v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02488
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zelin Zhao [view email]
[v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 21:05:49 UTC (1,820 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Harnessing LLMs as Agents: What Does It Cost?, by Zelin Zhao (Georgia Institute of Technology) and 4 other authors
  • View PDF

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning