Quad-State Safety Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models on Non-Canonical Inputs
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2610.09033 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Oct 2026]
Title:Quad-State Safety Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models on Non-Canonical Inputs
Authors:Pavan Maddula
View a PDF of the paper titled Quad-State Safety Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models on Non-Canonical Inputs, by Pavan Maddula
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Standard safety evaluations of large language models assess harmful requests written in canonical plain text, while models in real-world deployment routinely receive inputs containing emojis, altered spellings, encoded strings, and character-level variations. This work introduces the Adversarial Surface-Form Robustness Dataset (ASRD), comprising 2,100 prompts across seven distinct surface-form families. Five open-weight language models are evaluated across these prompts, producing 10,500 responses. The Quad-State Evaluation Rubric classifies each response into one of four outcomes: harmful compliance, safe response, comprehension failure, or indeterminate. Emoji and invisible Unicode variations cause almost no comprehension failure, with pooled harmful compliance of 20.27% and 17.20% against a 22.87% baseline that is driven mainly by Mistral 7B, whereas leetspeak, encoded wrappers, and hybrid transformations score 2.40%, 0.13%, and 2.40% while comprehension failure rises to 36.47%, 65.60%, and 34.47%. Inspection of raw model outputs reveals three response behaviors: hallucinated benignity, structural collapse, and language drift. Project page: this http URL
| Comments: | Accepted at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Self-Evolving Diversity-Driven Search for Robust AI Systems (EvoRobust). 12 pages, 11 tables. Project page: this https URL Dataset: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.09033 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2610.09033v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09033
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Quad-State Safety Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models on Non-Canonical Inputs, by Pavan Maddula
Additional Features
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.