arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Prompt-Model Interaction Reaches the Fixed Points: A deterministic, task-free structural readout -- and the factorizations of it that failed

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.21315 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Aug 2026]

Title:Prompt-Model Interaction Reaches the Fixed Points: A deterministic, task-free structural readout -- and the factorizations of it that failed

View a PDF of the paper titled Prompt-Model Interaction Reaches the Fixed Points: A deterministic, task-free structural readout -- and the factorizations of it that failed, by Nicol\'as Vera Z\'u\~niga
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:That a prompt's effect is not a property of the prompt is established: prompts optimised for one model degrade on another, and rankings reorder under neutral reformatting. That evidence is about task accuracy, which cannot say whether the interaction is a fact about task machinery or about the conditional distribution itself. We ask on a readout with no task in it: the fixed-point structure of the short-window argmax map x_{t+1} = argmax_x p(x | x_{t-1}, x_t), censused from 96 starts. It is deterministic, so nothing can be helped or hurt, and it exists only at short windows -- four of six models lose it entirely by window 16 -- so everything here concerns how a model reads a fragment. Two results. First, the interaction reaches this readout at full magnitude: nine tokens of conditioning move the fixed-point fraction across most of its range, change a four-way structural class, and reorder models, while instruction tuning worth 60.5 IFEval points moves the class by zero. Second, nothing we proposed carries it. Prefix length fails: the effect is not monotone. Four phenomenological factors -- prose-versus-markup, a universal direction, bidirectionality, instruct-resistance -- were each withdrawn within one run of being proposed, dissolved by widening the sample. And the nearest mechanistic account, attention-sink dominance of early tokens, predicts the sign of the shift on 2 of 5 models -- chance -- while a length-by-content cross shows it holds on real text and fails on our probe's uniformly random input, so we are outside its regime, not against it. One fixed nine-token prefix drives four models toward 0 and two toward 1; the bidirectionality survives in-distribution starts. On this readout the unit of explanation is the prompt-model pair. The recurring error it caught in us has a name: a criterion with a shape applied to a quantity with no room to vary.
Comments: 11 pages, 4 tables. Companion to arXiv:2608.10986. Code, per-run results, and the findings ledger: this https URL (archived: this https URL)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.21315 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.21315v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21315
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nicolás Vera [view email]
[v1] Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:25:18 UTC (23 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Prompt-Model Interaction Reaches the Fixed Points: A deterministic, task-free structural readout -- and the factorizations of it that failed, by Nicol\'as Vera Z\'u\~niga
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language